Wildland Firefighting Practice Exam

Which method of attack is considered the most dangerous?

1. Direct method

2. Indirect method

3. Parallel method

4. Tandem action

The correct answer is: Parallel method

The parallel method of attack is considered the most dangerous because it involves fire suppression on the edge of the fire without engaging directly with its head or flanks. This technique can expose firefighters to unpredictable fire behavior and shifting winds, resulting in a higher risk of entrapment or exposure to intense heat and flames. Additionally, when firefighters operate in a parallel manner, they may inadvertently create a situation where the fire has the potential to burn towards them or become erratic. This method requires a keen awareness of the fire's behavior and a quick response to changes in conditions, making it one of the more hazardous options available to wildland firefighters. In contrast, the direct method involves attacking the fire directly at its edge, allowing firefighters to control the situation more effectively, whereas the indirect method is used for larger fires, creating control lines that are generally safer away from the active fire perimeter. Tandem action, which typically involves coordination between multiple suppression groups, may also enhance safety by distributing risk among them. This understanding highlights why the parallel method poses significant challenges and dangers during fire suppression efforts.